The following report posted by The Rules-Keeper, Patricia A. Shaffer, to newsgroup news.admin.net-abuse.email, October 16, 2002*:
Votes having been tallied and certified, these are the Rules of Spam:
Rule #0: Spam is theft.
Rule #1: Spammers lie.
Russell's Admonition: Always assume that there is a measurable
chance that the entity you are dealing with is a spammer.
Lexical Contradiction: Spammers will redefine any term in order to
disguise their abuse of Internet resources.
Sharp's Corollary: Spammers attempt to re-define "spamming" as that
which they do not do.
Finnell's Corollary: Spammers define "remove" as "validate."
Rule #2: If a spammer seems to be telling the truth, see Rule #1.
Crissman's Corollary: A spammer, when caught, blames his victims.
Moore's Corollary: Spammers' lies are seldom questioned by mainstream media.**
Rule #3: Spammers are stupid.
Angel's Commentary: Spammers think it's okay to steal a little bit
from a lot of people.
Krueger's Corollary: Spammer lies are really stupid.
Pickett's Commentary: Spammer lies are boring.
Russell's Corollary: Never underestimate the stupidity of spammers.
Spinosa's Corollary: Spammers assume everybody is more stupid than
themselves.
Spammer's Standard of Discourse: Threats and intimidation trump facts
and logic.
Rule #4: The natural course of a spamming business is to go bankrupt.
Rules-Keeper Shaffer's Refrain: Spammers routinely prove the Rules of
Spam are valid.
Blinky Bonus Quote
Blinky would like to add a wonderfully concise example of Rule #3, here. This is the lead of a recent bit of Usenet spam. You do the math:
Ask Yourself 3 Simple Questions 1) Do You Need a New PC or PC UPGRADE ? 2) Would You Like To build Your Own Online ? 3) Do You Want a PC at Trade Price ? 4) Do You Live In The UK ? 5) Would You Like To Purchase Online ?